Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 05, 2009, 10:57 AM // 10:57   #381
Krytan Explorer
 
StormX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Mo
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EPO Bot View Post
Maybe not, because that means there are only a few irredeemable leachers to be tracked down and have their computers trashed.
Precisely why I don't see why it is so difficult to ban these people. It's not as though we have an army of farm-bots with "asdsgdfdgg" type names. These individuals have been reported repeatedly by many different people. I'll bet some have been reported hundreds of times.

Quote:
What I don't understand is, why are we not allowed to show their names on here? Wouldn't it make sense that we all know who they are so we can report them or at least be wary of them? And if Anet, by chance, sees them, then maybe they might even do something?
Maybe there are some legal issues to do with it? I dunno. It's not defamation if it's true.
StormX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 06:42 PM // 18:42   #382
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Green Chiken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: From California to Arizona
Exclamation Fort Aspenwood getting Worse

So i recently started playing FA hardcore and i noticed in one of my matches a nec that used Aura of the Lich a few times. After the timer ended and we went to get amber, the Nec killed herself and the minions killed Gunther ending the game. These are called "Griefers" or thats what the Kurzicks call them. I dont know if i can post any of the Griefers names so i wont because i dont want my post to be deleted but people said a whole team reported one of the Griefers and there account deleted. There are 2 more that still run around killing off Gunther, plus someone posted a video on youtube how to use the Griefer build. Which means that people who see the video are gonna think its funny and every round is gonna be another suicide to kill off gunther. So most people bring "Vetra's" to use when this happens or either use the monks to heal so gunther doesnt die. I think Anet needs to do something about this otherwise FA is not gonna be worth playing. Plus the leechers in FA on the luxon side is an extreme problem, we had one game where a guys whole team were leechers so we just sat and talked and nobody killed eachother. So basically anyone who has a Griefer (the kurz will call them out because they know who they are) everyone report these characters so we can get FA back as its suppose to be.
Green Chiken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 06:50 PM // 18:50   #383
Furnace Stoker
 
Painbringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Black Widows of Death
Profession: W/Mo
Default

This is an increasing problem - there is a thread in the sardelac about it.

People are bored and doing anything they can to ruin the fun of others

Report report report
Painbringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 07:04 PM // 19:04   #384
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Celeborn10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In my lair...
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Chiken View Post
So basically anyone who has a Griefer (the kurz will call them out because they know who they are) everyone report these characters so we can get FA back as its suppose to be.
Reporting won't solve the problem. Look where reporting leechers has gotten the Luxons. At the same time this is a way for Luxons who don't care to adapt their builds to work or can't win with 2-4 leechers to win within 2 minutes (if they have a second account). The only way that this will go away is when Anet wakes up and finds their 'beginner's arena' is full of leechers on Luxons and griefers on Kurzick.

Perhaps deleting the Necro class from PvP would do, I don't think there have been any non-degenerative Necro builds (except Tainted but that may as well be regarded as a gimmick with heros). PvP wouldn't really suffer with FF and WoD gone. It might even bring condition pressure back *gasp*. (after the game's pace gets toned down)

Last edited by Celeborn10; Mar 05, 2009 at 07:07 PM // 19:07..
Celeborn10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 08:22 PM // 20:22   #385
Desert Nomad
 
wilebill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt Vernon, Ohio
Guild: Band of the Hawk
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Well, I can verify that the leeching problem on the Luxon side is severe. I have not been in any battles where Gunther mysteriously kicked the bucket. Only thing kicking the bucket has been the Luxon team trying to get by with 4 or 5 players.

ANet does need to step in, no doubt about it.

As for griefers, they have been around since the release of Prophecies. You can report them. Won't do much good. Same thing with the leechers, report them but nothing much seems to happen.

The griefing problem is much worse on GW than WoW in my experience. Playing WoW since its release, I only saw one griefer there. Comes from having GMs.
wilebill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 08:26 PM // 20:26   #386
Frost Gate Guardian
 
truemyths's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default

Gaile (thank goodness for Gaile) has noted in late January that the dev team is looking at Ft. Aspenwood.

and, btw, as a dedicated luxon I don't feel bad for you at all. every single match we have to deal with leechers that extremely limit our odds of winning vs. the occasional griefers on the kurzick side
truemyths is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 08:43 PM // 20:43   #387
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Profession: A/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truemyths View Post
Gaile (thank goodness for Gaile) has noted in late January that the dev team is looking at Ft. Aspenwood.

and, btw, as a dedicated luxon I don't feel bad for you at all. every single match we have to deal with leechers that extremely limit our odds of winning vs. the occasional griefers on the kurzick side
Let not bring leeching on Luxon side into this because guess what Kurz have them too. Thats why I stopped playing in FA. Although this particualr problem here isnt new. When I used to play before the AoTl change there were 2 people who always came in and built up an army using BiP on the npcs inside of the gate and the other person had a rez and when person with bip died person with rez created army then once full person b would sac himself and kill gunth. Altough now its easier. Does need to be dealt with.
Hailey Anne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 08:49 PM // 20:49   #388
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Profession: R/
Default

The problem is a direct consequence of extremely bad game design. Its all down to the Kurzick/Luxon title tracks. Even after the rebalance, these tracks are stupid to attain with normal gameplay. So any persone who wants them, but wants to stay sane, simply afk farms the competative missions.
Fay Vert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 09:00 PM // 21:00   #389
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: Lush
Default

The problem is a direct consequence of extremely lazy people who want titles with minimal effort. Its all down to the Kurzick/Luxon title tracks. Even after the rebalance, these tracks are not that hard to attain with vanquishing. So any person who wants them, but wants them immediately without putting effort into it, simply afk farms the competitive missions.
Pheenix Down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 05, 2009, 09:34 PM // 21:34   #390
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: BEN
Profession: R/N
Default

lol yeah remember when fort aspenwood was new.. one time I held the inner wall the whole time single handedly as a bonder- noone used to bring enchant removal XD I dunno how it is now but probably the sos

2 good monks could hold them outside.. even with hexers on us (who didn't bother to bring enchant removal)
Mustache Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2009, 07:41 AM // 07:41   #391
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Travelling around Tyria, Cantha, and Elona
Profession: P/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truemyths View Post
Gaile (thank goodness for Gaile) has noted in late January that the dev team is looking at Ft. Aspenwood.
Well, it's march and we still haven't heard anything from the devs about this problem. I was actually hoping that they would give us an update this month too. Let's hope April will give some better news.

And about the whole name thing on Guru.... any mods/admins want to tell me why we can't show their names here? (Out of curiosity)
Giga_Gaia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2009, 06:22 PM // 18:22   #392
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: W/Mo
Default

It has got to the point where most of the people playing on luxon are leechers. This means anyone who wants a game, will no doubt enter with at least 2 and more probably 5 leechers;

Hence they will not more play games after this. Means the next person to come along to play FA will be put off in a similar way, the leechers stay but any normal players have left.

It can only continue currently if there was a huge influx to the luxon side at the same time, meaning the leechers are spread through groups.

Are these leechers not classed as bots also? They are just 'simple' bots clicking the enter button place every 10 secs or so (or randomized to put off sense of bot)).
Squire Heats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2009, 07:01 PM // 19:01   #393
Furnace Stoker
 
Painbringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Black Widows of Death
Profession: W/Mo
Default

In Thursday's update it stated

"Warning we will be actively watching all areas of PVP for leeching and botting over the next few weeks we will be punishing and banning as needed. You have been warned."


Oh yeah it was in there cryptic.... but if you take the first vowel and 3 and 6 consonant of every 3rd sentence adding every other 3rd letter of a new paragraph you get the above warning.
Painbringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2009, 08:43 PM // 20:43   #394
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fay Vert View Post
The problem is a direct consequence of extremely bad game design. Its all down to the Kurzick/Luxon title tracks. Even after the rebalance, these tracks are stupid to attain with normal gameplay. So any persone who wants them, but wants to stay sane, simply afk farms the competative missions.
Agreed. The problem with leechers is that its a self fulfilling prophecy. Enter a match with like 2 leech, and pretty much can't win if the other team is decent, which means there won't be any meaningful faction. Which means people are stuck with vanquishing, or afk leech along with the other leechers....the smart ones probably go for leeching rather than frustrate/bore themselves to death vanquishing.
UnChosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2009, 10:53 PM // 22:53   #395
Jungle Guide
 
Gigashadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Profession: W/
Default

Don't expect anything more than a slap on the wrist. With the exception of Final Fantasy, no MMO even bans people for gold buying (they all try to make it sound as if they do, but they actually don't).
Gigashadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 07, 2009, 01:03 AM // 01:03   #396
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default

The problem is the stupid reporting system and how YOU get dishonor points against YOU if you report someone in FA and the rest of your team doesn't.
Red Sonya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 07, 2009, 03:06 AM // 03:06   #397
Frost Gate Guardian
 
s73ve_o's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Profession: W/
Default

though i agree that it seems to be against the luxons these days, "no longer balanced" is absolutely wrong. For the 1st couple years the odds were stacked pretty decidedly in the Luxon's favor. ive said it before and ill say it again: the kurz have payed our dues, now its the lux turn.

*it seems like there have been alot of complaints about FA and JQ being unbalanced against the luxons ever since the update. if i remember right i rarely if ever saw the kurz complaining. is it just me or are the luxons a bunch of whiners? (no offense) :P
s73ve_o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 08, 2009, 11:40 PM // 23:40   #398
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Travelling around Tyria, Cantha, and Elona
Profession: P/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s73ve_o View Post
though i agree that it seems to be against the luxons these days, "no longer balanced" is absolutely wrong. For the 1st couple years the odds were stacked pretty decidedly in the Luxon's favor. ive said it before and ill say it again: the kurz have payed our dues, now its the lux turn.
Two words. Siege turtles. Completely imba now more than ever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s73ve_o View Post
*it seems like there have been alot of complaints about FA and JQ being unbalanced against the luxons ever since the update. if i remember right i rarely if ever saw the kurz complaining. is it just me or are the luxons a bunch of whiners? (no offense) :P
Kurz complaints seem to fall on deaf ears, apparently.
Giga_Gaia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 09, 2009, 12:28 AM // 00:28   #399
Furnace Stoker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: Amazon Basin [AB]
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s73ve_o View Post
though i agree that it seems to be against the luxons these days, "no longer balanced" is absolutely wrong. For the 1st couple years the odds were stacked pretty decidedly in the Luxon's favor. ive said it before and ill say it again: the kurz have payed our dues, now its the lux turn.
Fair would be actual balance, not vengeance.

Also, you are shooting yourself in the foot. Luxons would actually play FA and not force you to wait 10 years to enter match if they had a fair chance at winning.

The heal sig buff was noticeable, the luxon warrior idiots tend to survive against the ele NPCs now. They still do next to nothing when pushing into the green gate though.

The only small JQ imbalance (which applies in some degree to FA) is that luxons generally get more leechers due to the smaller number of players. Not only do the leechers get faster games due to no wait times, when the number of luxon players is small, they can make up half the entering party- because a leech "plays" 24/7 while other players come and go.

Still the win/loss ratio in JQ feels about even to me, mostly determined by how many RoJ monks there are. >_> So I'll keep going there instead of wasting time in FA.
FoxBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 09, 2009, 01:14 AM // 01:14   #400
Desert Nomad
 
Esprit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Dvd Forums [DVDF]
Profession: E/
Default

I would also like to note that the Kurzick/Luxon title track is not the only cause of leechers in FA/JQ.

You see r12's leeching because of their Alliance owning towns.

They either leech to fulfill their daily quota, leech to get paid (if you are in such a guild) to donate, or leech just because it's effortless faction gain (no need to VQ or actually fight when you get it for free and otherwise waste your time).

If Anet took away the reason for leeching (Amber/Jade, Zkeys, titles, etc...) they would probably kill the activity of those arenas too.
Esprit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Servant of Kali Gladiator's Arena 81 Jul 05, 2007 03:08 PM // 15:08
Full guide to bonding gates in Fort Aspenwood - like a thesis, only longer! Paperfly Explorer's League 84 Oct 05, 2006 08:02 AM // 08:02
fort aspenwood!! Im Perfect U Aint Sardelac Sanitarium 1 Jun 05, 2006 02:09 AM // 02:09
Fort Aspenwood creed-shaman Sardelac Sanitarium 1 May 05, 2006 01:37 PM // 13:37


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 AM // 01:04.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("